Which case highlighted the importance of the right to counsel during police interrogations?

Miranda v. Arizona is significant because it established the requirement for law enforcement to inform individuals of their rights to counsel and against self-incrimination during police interrogations. The case arose when Ernesto Miranda was not informed of his rights before being interrogated by the police, which led to a confession that was used against him in court. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination requires that individuals in custody be informed of their rights, thus ensuring that any confession is made voluntarily and with an understanding of the legal implications. This landmark decision underlines the necessity of legal counsel as a safeguard in the judicial process, particularly during police interrogations, ensuring that individuals have access to legal representation and are aware of their rights.